DISQUS

observer · 2 years ago

You mean he is worse than the one who committed perjury?
I don't think so, but it depends on what your definition of is is.

Anonymous · 2 years ago

Senate Confirms Mukasey as Attorney General

navyvet50 · 2 years ago

I am not a student of the history of American presidents, so I can only observe that Dubya is the worst president in my 53 years of life.
Yes, worst than Clinton or Nixon.
Lying about about a blowjob did not cause the
deaths of almost 4,000 military heroes.
Just Dubya assault on that piece of paper "The Constitution" makes him the worst president in my lifetime.

Raziorizzo · 2 years ago

Guess we all forgot about Carter , unemployement at all time high , interest rates in the teens, gas prices worse than they are today Russia breathing down our throats , American hostages in Iran , failed "rescue" attempt.
Clinton who totally ignored terrorist and failed to act against terrorist
And stop with your pathetic bullshit.
President Bush stood up against terrorism and is winning the war. People die in war Navypet. They are Americas hero You are the pathetic anti-American who can only hope that we lose the war. You are the one that wants to see America weak. You are the one who praises Carter for weakening our military. You are truly a pathetic person.

Raziorizzo · 2 years ago

Guess no one mentions that the democratic led congress is at a all time low ,18% approval
That doesn't fit the agenda .....does it?

John Ehrenfeld · 2 years ago

Bush's approval ratings are the lowest of any president in history. Deal with it. He is loathed and despised and for good reason.

You say "people die in war" so casually and that is the problem. It should not be the norm; especially when a million people die for nothing. Aside from a fringe neo-con cult, the American people reject this. This was not a war embarked upon as a last resort because we were threatened. That has been proven to be a lie.

neocon · 2 years ago

Your demo congress is right there with him. Go Mukasey!

monica · 2 years ago

Bush should have been getting head like Clinton instead of meeting the terrorists head-on?

observer · 2 years ago

You mean he is worse than the one who committed perjury?
I don't think so, but it depends on what your definition of is is.

Raziorizzo · 2 years ago

Has the democrats figured out what to do if Hillary doesn't get the nomination. Who are they going to put up there Obama?? Edwards??? They are headed for a landfall defeat.

WASP · 2 years ago

Hillary's nomination will cause the largest voter turnout in history - to defeat her.

Raziorizzo · 2 years ago

>> Subject: Fwd: Hillary's Indian Name
>>
>>
>>>> Hillary's Indian Name
>>> >
>>> > Senator Hillary Clinton was invited to address a major gathering of
>>> > The
>>> > American Indian nation two weeks ago in upper New York State.
>>> > She spoke for almost an hour on her future plans for increasing every
>>> > native
>>> > American's present standard of living, should she one day become the
>>> > first
>>> > female President. She referred to her career as a New York Senator,
>>> > how
>>> > she
>>> > had signed "yes" for every Indian issue that came to her desk for
>>> > approval...
>>> >
>>> > Although the Senator was vague on the details of her plan, she seemed
>>> > most
>>> > enthusiastic about her future ideas for helping her "red sisters and
>>> > brothers". At the conclusion of her speech, the Tribes presented the
>>> > Senator with a plaque inscribed with her new Indian name - Walking
>>> > Eagle.
>>> > The proud Senator then departed in her motorcade, waving to the
>>> > crowds. A
>>> > news reporter later inquired of the group of chiefs of how they had
>>> > come
>>> > to
>>> > select the new name given to the Senator. They explained that
>>> > Walking
>>> > Eagle
>>> > is the name given to a bird so full of shit it can no longer fly.

navyvet50 · 2 years ago

The low approval rating of Congress is due to the Repugs blocking and Dubya vetoing what the America people want. We will get our revenge at the ballot box. The Democrats could run any of their top contenders and beat the Repugs.
Repugs-Out of Ideas and full of Fear.

Raziorizzo · 2 years ago

Full of fear??? We are the ones taking on the terrorist. The dems are the ones who want to cut and run. The dems are the one who pulled the Marines out of Somolia with their tail between their legs. The dems are the one who let the terrorist run free in the 90's wnd were afraid to do anything because Clinton was worried about ratings and legacy. Your right we shall see in Nov and so far the dems have shown they are weak in the war on terror, the want to propose the highest tax hike in US history, Hillary is weak at the knees,Obama ic clueless and Edwards is an ambulance chaser. Who do they have to run against Giuliani/Romney/McCain?

navyvet50 · 2 years ago

Your still a coward--Assrizzo
Check Faux they have a new boogyman to make you to piss your pants.
Dubya taking on the terrorist? HA Ha Ha Ha, now that is funny. Where is Osama. Oh yeah, Dubya could not catch a cold.
Running against the top Repug contenders, after the American people have witnessed the stupidity, incompetence, lies and lack of respect for the American way of life and the Constitution by the Repug party and Dubya ----Priceless-----
Dubya and the Repugs have spent us so far into debt that the Chinese have us by the balls with the money we owe them.
Repugs--Out of ideas and sooooooo Full of Fear.

Navyvet50 · 2 years ago

Nixon-Smarter than Dubya
Reagan-Cut and Ran from Lebanon Better than Dubya
Carter- A REAL Christian-Better than Dubya
Bush Senior-Did not invade Iraq-better than Dubya
Clinton-did not spend us into massive debt-Better than Dubya
Repugs- Out of Ideas and full of Fear!!!!

Raziorizzo · 2 years ago

Why don't you face it. Democratic leadership is in disarray and congress approval ratings is the lowest in history. Democrats have yet to send the president a single annual appropriations bill. It's been at least 20 years since Congress has gone this late in passing any appropriation bills, an indication of the mess the Pelosi-Reid Congress is now in. The democrats are proposing a huge spike in federal spending and offering the biggest tax increase in history. Democratic leaders have ignored the progress made in Iraq by the surge, diminished the efforts of our military, and wasted precious time with failed attempts to force an immediate withdrawal from Iraq. After promising on the campaign trail to "support our troops," Democrats tried to cut off funding for our military while our soldiers and Marines are under fire from the enemy. Now the Democrats party's leaders are stalling an emergency supplemental bill with funding for body armor, bullets and mine-resistant vehicles.
The list of Congress's failures grows each month. No energy bill. No action on health care. No action on the mortgage crisis. No immigration reform. No progress on renewing No Child Left Behind. Precious little action on judges and not enough on reducing trade barriers. Congress has not done its work. And these failures will have consequences. And in case you didn't know The Democratic victory in 2006 was narrow. They won the House by 85,961 votes out of over 80 million cast and the Senate by a mere 3,562 out of over 62 million cast. A party that wins control by that narrow margin can quickly see its fortunes reversed when it fails to act responsibly, fails to fulfill its promises, and fails to lead. Are you sure we are the ones out of ideas and full of fear?? Sounds like the democrats are headed for a landfall defeat in '08 buddy.

Anonymous · 2 years ago

Are you sure we are the ones out of ideas and full of fear?? YES!!!

I am no buddy of a chickenhawk coward.

You are too stupid and thick to realize that the Repubs blocking the will of the American people is in large part what is driving down the poll numbers for Congress. Everytime they block child care, the end to the occupation of Iraq, stem cell research and on and on the numbers go down for Congress.
Following a LIE!!!!!
Democrats party's leaders are stalling an emergency supplemental bill with funding for body armor, bullets and mine-resistant vehicles.

The funding includes all of that and a raise for our troops over what your "Support the Troops" president wants to give them. You would not even know about the need for body armor if not for the liberal media.
Repugs-No ideas, nothing but Fear!!!!

NavyVet50 · 2 years ago

Last "Anonymous" comment is mine.

Repugs-No ideas, Nothing but Fear

Raziorizzo · 2 years ago

Fear?? Hillary has to plant questions in the audience because of her FEAR to get asked the wrong question.
The democrats greatest FEAR is the we are winning the war.
John Edwards has a FEAR he will not get nominated
Demcorats FEAR the Republicans, thats why they are useless. They had the FEAR that they couldn't stop the Mukasey appointment. You keep up your propoganda you may start beleiving it

joaquin · 2 years ago

...and BNF fears Fox because it levels the playing field with the left pitch of MSNBC.

Grayson · 2 years ago

So what is the deal with this rating system? I've seen all conservative comments marked with many negatives and the liberal statements with positives. One of Raz's comments had more than 3 negatives and was removed. So this is basically a way to silence anyone with a non ultra left wing liberal viewpoint? Ha, I love liberals and their warped idea of free speech.

Democrats, "Do as I say, not as I do."

stevin · 2 years ago

According to the 911 commission, Richard Clarke (a Republican) went to Rice a week before Sept 11 and scolded her asking: What will it take you people to do something, an attack on Americans, possible on American soil and resulting in the death of perhaps hundreds. When the man in charge of counter terrorism is ignored and has his department de-funded, that doesn't speak of an adminstration that's on top of things. Rather an adminstration that was lax. There could be no gaurantee, that we could have stopped the attacks of that day, but it's pretty apparent that they could have done more. And you can complain about the Democrats all you want it doesn't change the fact that Bush was asleep at the wheel.

By the way, those of you who are still strong supporters of the war but do so from the safety of your home ... a question: When are you signing up to go? I ask because my brother volunteered to go back to Iraq and is there as I write. He's a marine colonel. I could put in a good word for you and you could be there in weeks. If you're not tough enough to be in the Marines, the Army is taking anybody these days. Go to www.Goarmy.com and make an appointment to meet a recruitment officer. Let me know when you sign up.

stevin · 2 years ago

And this from today's NY Times:

WASHINGTON, Nov. 10 — As the insurgency in Iraq escalated in the spring of 2004, American officials entrusted an Iraqi businessman with issuing weapons to Iraqi police cadets training to help quell the violence.

By all accounts, the businessman, Kassim al-Saffar, a veteran of the Iran-Iraq war, did well at distributing the Pentagon-supplied weapons from the Baghdad Police Academy armory he managed for a military contractor. But, co-workers say, he also turned the armory into his own private arms bazaar with the seeming approval of some American officials and executives, selling AK-47 assault rifles, Glock pistols and heavy machine guns to anyone with cash in hand — Iraqi militias, South African security guards and even American contractors.

“This was the craziest thing in the world,” said John Tisdale, a retired Air Force master sergeant who managed an adjacent warehouse. “They were taking weapons away by the truckload.”

Activities at that armory and other warehouses help explain how the American military lost track of some 190,000 pistols and automatic rifles supplied by the United States to Iraq’s security forces in 2004 and 2005, as auditors discovered in the past year.

************************************
Tisdale's comments were an understatement. Rather than "craziest" I would have said "the most incompetent". Just more of the same from an administration without clue. SP

Raziorizzo · 2 years ago

First of all Richard Clarke never went to Rice a week before Sept 11 and scolded her asking: What will it take you people to do something, an attack on Americans, possible on American soil and resulting in the death of perhaps hundreds.
That is a lie. There was no report of terrorist using planes to crash into building either.
Second of all where do you get off saying you cannot support the war if you didn't serve in the Military. Good example is John Kerry. He served and he couldn't lead a platoon of soldiers to the dinner table. Gimme a break with that BS. You all have the same talking points. I know soldiers who were in the military for 15 years and never saw action, so does that mean they don't know what they are talking about. You want to know why the democrats are going to get defeated in '08? You one of the reasons why. Keep up the good work buddy. Your brother is an American hero. You..........your a different story

Stevin · 2 years ago

Raz:
From the "911 Commission Report:

"On the day of the meeting [September 4], Clarke sent Rice an impassionate personal note. He criticized US counterterrorism efforts past and present. The "real question" he wrote, was "are we serious about dealing with the al Qida [sic]threat?... Decision makers should imagine themselves on a future day when the CSG has not succeeded in stopping Al Qida attacks and hundreds of Americans lay dead in several countries, including the US" (p. 212)

From the Chapter titled, "The systems was blinking read", the section titled "High probability of near-term 'spectacular attacks;" ..." On June 25 [2001] Clarke warned Rice and Hadley that six seperate intelligence reports showed al Qaeda personnel warning of a pending attack ... On June 28, Clarke wrote Rice that the pattern of al Qaeda activity indication attack planning over the past six weeks had 'reached a crescendo" (p. 257)

The Presidential Daily Bried on August 6, 2001 was titled: "Bin Lauden Determined to strike the US"

With regards to the 19 attending flight schools and the warnings that were filtering up, "Other instructors who worked with Hazmi and Mihdhar remember them as poor students who focused on controlling the aircraft in flight but took no interest in takeoffs and landings" (p. 222)

So why aren't you joining up? I ask because there are many soldiers who are on 2nd and 3rd deployments. Like my brother who volunteered to go back. Maybe if more people who think we should have this war are willing to go there, then the burden won't fall on the shoulders of a the same soldiers. I have every right to ask the question.

John Kerry is credited with turning is patrol boat around at a time when they were taking fire from the Vietgong. He did so to rescue one of his soldiers who had fallen into the water, and I believed was wounded. He was given a medal for the action. His soldier of course has always been thankful for Kerry's action.

Raziorizzo · 2 years ago

The PDB report (Presidental Daily Breifing) stated Al-Qaeda was planning a terrorist act against America. It was vague , it did not state airplanes did not give any specifics. Like I said before, could more of been done to prevent 9/11? Yes it can. Not only by the President administration but by previous administrations. I have a problem with people who want to dump 30 years of turmoil in the mideast against the USA all on President Bushs' lap. While there is progress in the war in Iraq the democrats refuse to accept it. They are so invested in defeat it will be hard for them to accept any good news.

Stevin · 2 years ago

Raz:
You should be careful making assumptions; I'm not a Democrat. I dropped my affiliation with them a decade ago and switched to Independant because they were up to the same stupid tricks that the Reps were. If the Ind's can come up with a viable presidential candidate I may vote for him or her be they a former Dem of a Rep. And I've voted for candidates in many political parties over the years.

As for the reference to me not being a hero. I never made any claim that I was.

There is progress in Iraq. I'm in communication with my brother and saw him for a day this past summer when he was home for a visit. He had a full photo array from Anbar where his job is to make alliances with Sunnis and Shiites who have had it with al Qaeda. What's also apparent from the photos and from my brother's reports is that the province is totally devasted from the years of war. So I'm worried that although some of the immediate problems have been solved, longer term ones may persist. The same way after the Afghantan war when American forces and the Soviets left, but neither side did anything about the devasting effects of the war. As most conceded, it was the post-war climate that helped lead to the rise of the Taliban, the very people whom we recruited (and armed) to help us fight the Soviets.

While it's true there has been some progress in Iraq - it's still relative. According to an AP report today the number of Iraqi civilians killed in October is down from 1023 in September to 905 in October. Indiscriminant mortar attacks has fallen by half for a full three months, so it seems the surge is having a positive effect. But were still talking about 369 of such attacks. When you factor in that hundreds of thousands of Iraqis have fled the country, this may also account for the drop in deaths as there just fewer people around to kill.

And you're right, and Clarke made the same point that it wasn't just Bush and the Reps who could have done more to hunt down al Qaeda. But it was the Reps who portrayed themselves as the ones who would solve the problem, and as we speak it's the Reps who still make it seem like it's only the Dems who are weak are terror. It should be pointed out that after the '93 attacks on the WTC, it was the Clinton administration who hunted down the perpetrators, put them on trial where they were convicted and are in prison today.

When you read the 911 report what is evident, and Clarke makes this point, is that when the administration switched from Clinton to Bush the attention to terrorism waned, thus the reason why Ashcroft began to downsize Clarke's counter-terrorism department. Clarke vociferously claimed. And while I was wrong the he didn't tell Rice in person about hundreds of Americans possibly dying on our soil, he did put it in a memo as he was finding it harder and harder to for the Bush administration to take him seriously.

And you're right the PDB never said anything about planes as bomb, that part was removed before it was given to the President. One wonders why. But given the other warnings about radical muslims wanting to only wanting to steer planes, one who've hoped they could have put it all together. It's remarkable that the heros who stopped flight 93 from reaching it's probable DC target were unable to get into the cockpit of the plane and possible re-gain control of the plane. But they couldn't because the door was locked.

Raziorizzo · 2 years ago

Well said. Praying for your brother to get home safely. God speed. Tell him America is behind him and his efforts. Best of luck

TAH · 2 years ago

History will remember Bush as the worse president in American history, and it will remember him as the man who did nothing good for the country or its people.

I doubt history will remember - and it really should - the political circumstances which allowed such an incompetant and corrupt administration to arise. Nixon could only dream of pulling the sort of crap the current administration has, and has gotten away with.

And why? Because there is no such thing as democrats and republicans, there is only rich and poor. Senators and Congressmen are all rich so they're all on the same side. It is the ineptitude of congress which has allowed the corruption and malpractice of the current administration to continue.

Take war, as an example. When half a million people marched in protest against the Vietnam War it began a process leading to its end. When 10 million people marched in protest of the Iraq war it achieved nothing.

Why?

Raziorizzo · 2 years ago

I've done some soul searching and I've decided to vote for Hillary.