-
Website
http://foxattacks.com/ -
Original page
http://new.foxattacks.com/blog/?p=670 -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
are we having fun yet?
32 comments · 1 points
-
eplaining4u
218 comments · 1 points
-
busterII
60 comments · 3 points
-
ChicagoSpeaks
354 comments · 2 points
-
newsforbrains
26 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
http://www.mediamonitors.net/mosaddeq32.html
The business of a journalist now is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, fall at the feet of Mammon and sell himself for his daily bread. We are tools, vessels of rich men behind the scenes, we are jumping jacks. They pull the strings; we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are the properties of these men. We are intellectual prostitutes.�[1]
People don't have to support Sen. Obama but he has the right to be treated fairly and as Media Watch, FAIR and others have pointed out, contrary to claims the media is soft on him, he is being subjected to more personal attacks using 'guilt by association' than any other candidate.
Enough!
I think a lot of people are totally fed up with this garbage! The answer is to send a letter and change the channel.
Otherwise, very true sentiments. When I watch Fox (I have low blood pressure and do this to raise it) I have seen nothing but an attempt to tear this person down. This is the same will all "right" programming.
It's a sad testiment that the only person to try to rise above the pathetic nature of our politics is ripped down in such a vicious way.
I am not about to get involved in a who's the lessor shit rally that our electoral process has turned into. And that is what it is.
Anyone who votes in this election is dumber than a broken bottle of molasses.
I say screw them- They are all alike- so let them select their grand "poobah" because they are going to do it anyway!
If Nazis, Islamic Jihad and Republicans think it's Evil - Then being a liberal is the correct thing to be.
I embrace all the things that truly define what a Liberal is. Not what the media defines a liberal as.
I say anyone that doesn't embrace Liberalism in the truest sense of the definition is Un-American, Anti-Democratic, pro-totalitarianism, pro-fascism and is helping the terrorists to take away your liberties.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7iW5kOB1pmg
Plug it in and listen to a few FACTS without all the bleeps and showbiz nonsense added to an already complex system of misinformation.
Then tell me something important.
Fox News is just one of the outlets he uses to manipulate public opinion through lies masquerading as news. He IS the biggest threat to our democracy!!! We ALL have to do something now, before it's too late. One thing we can do is NOT WATCH Fox News or ABC.
Actually, the Wright clips really are from 2007. Hannity has been trying to demonize Wright and his church for OVER A YEAR now. That's the problem — FOX runs a story, and the rest of the media thinks, "Well, if fox is doing a story on it, maybe we should, too..."
http://www.geocities.com/northstarzone/FED2.html
And I'm actually a RON PAUL REPUBLICAN!
I'm also a student of history. Modern day American media is virtually the same as the Pravda and Tass days of the Soviet Union. Media ownership (electronic/print) is overwhelmingly right-wing; not conservative, but radical right. It parrots the radical right-wing line.
We essentially live under a corporate dictatorship that controls the media, the government and the state religion. Barack Obama is a tremendous threat to this incredibly powerful and wealthy cabal. Hillary is not. The radical right is convinced McCain can beat Hillary. They're not dumb - they know McCain cannot beat Barack.
Even if Hillary did manage to win the democratic nomination and go on to beat McCain - no problem. Hillary has been cozying up to the radicals of late, note the endorsement of Clinton by right-wing radical, Richard Mellon Scaife's newspaper, the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review.
This is a domestic political cold war with the stakes every bit as high as the old American/Russian dust up. Barack is the Anti-Christ. Now, the Clinton's have sprung an 11th hour commercial in Pennsylvania that flashes a picture of bin Laden. The jingoistic Clinton, of course, hopes that the rubes will combine this with her description of Barack as 'elite' (a coded racist term for 'Uppity' ") and give her a wider margin in PA. She needs to win by about 25 points, she's currently at about 5 or 6.
The bin Laden reference is somewhat ironic insofar as bin Laden is most likely dead (though for some reason no major media will pursue the story).
Hillary is in very imminent danger of estranging herself from decent democrats forever. Take a look at the credible democrats (including Reich and Richardson from her husband's administration) who are endorsing Barack.
And Obama can go to any church he wants to in America. Thats part of what this Land is suppose to be about: freedom of religion. (even if in my mind most of them are outdated.)
You say FOX 'distorts'
..Anyware else in the world it would be called lying.It wouldnt fly here(north EU)but why do the FOX thing keep up?And why does fly st your place?
To not see the fakes,regardless of political stand,seem impossible.
Its so obvious false,the kind and method is the forth graders,the slow in forth. In need for a friend or just a hug by mom,but this they dont know.So they alarm around smelliing farts from kings and queens,telling they are S M E L L Y! BUT anyone in theire neighbourhood knows,bitterly,whare this stench is originating.
To be a honest republican(as i gather it must be
some)have to be dreadful.
And this perveted variety of christianity sold and bought and stolen and rebought just be rented as long you dont read the book and you may fabulate up what you want as long you dont understand
I dont belive catholics ponder the mystery and the word at all.They are still executing the old roman religion.But with subtitles to learn by heart and used to not talk about the mystery.
And the pope is in the US.
Wont keep him?
Im not your average us-hating euro-snob.
I state that i love the us.Simply for all wonders you brought-blues-electric light etc but you need to see that you no matter what,is just ONE nation,so are we here in Sweden.
Theres no point being some imaginary No1.
sigh
Good luck boneheads! :)
(L Cohen sings-US is the cradle of the best-and the worst)
Think about it: the bulk of mainstream media is owned by corporations. Now what happens if they run a story that goes against corporate interests? Why, the corporations get hurt, and thus, the media outlet they own. Solution: self-censorship, although you can bet anyone on a paper or TV show who was too anti-Establishment would be booted out in short order by the corporate board of trustees.
This is why there's no serious talk in the mainstream media about creating real financial equality in the US or worldwide. Its not that it isn't possible (though many media outlets would like to convince you otherwise), and its not because there isn't the will--there just isn't the corporate will, and thus, no media will.
This relates to the reason politics in this country is a no-win game. (Another is that any kind of a hierarchy is oppressive and anti-democratic.) In order to get any real media attention (a necessary step to getting elected), or gather the funds necessary to launch a successful campaign, a presidential candidate has to pander to corporate interests. Sure, Obama may not be Big Business' best friend, but when was the last time he (or any other) serious presidential candidate criticized a monetary system which requires the rich get richer and the poor get poorer? (The Democrats' "solution" is to settle for a milder level of exploitation.)
And an anti-Establishment President would quickly be rendered powerless by Big Business and Big Media.
Case in point: Eliot Spitzer. Ever wonder why the prostitution scandal came out just when it did? Could've been related to the fact that Spitzer was literally just about to launch a crusade against predatory loaning, subprime mortgages, and the Bush regime. But now that Spitzer's been discredited, Bush and other corporate interests are safe from the horrible populists. (Republican Senator David Vitter of Louisiana has also been involved in prostitution, but so far nobody in the media has made a big deal about it. If he ever has a go at the present Establishment, though ...)
For the record, I am a reformist. I believe in progressive politics. I just want to point out that reform will only take us so far in a system so fundamental flawed.
If we ever want to achieve a truly just, egalitarian, peaceful, democratic way of life, at some point we're going to move outside the present system of government.
WAKE UP AND SMELL THE NEW WORLD ORDER.
Ron Paul IS the only viable candidate and he is being ignnored by ALL US MEDIA. Ever ask yourself WHY???
Watch this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7iW5kOB1pmg
It's so much better and factual than this lame Brave New Films BS propaganda nonsense you all think is so cool.
It's obvious--there is simply no progressive version of Fox News on TV. There's nothing even close.
We can at least be encouraged that, even with McCain getting a TOTAL pass in the media (at least so far), with an entire network to cheerlead for him (Fox News), and the Democrats fighting (for the moment), polls show that McCain is only running even with either Obama or Clinton.
McCain should be ahead by 15 points by this time, under the current media conditions.
When the Democrats pick a candidate, we can unite and go after the REAL enemy--McCain.
What will be different? Two long time insiders??
Those who time and again say one person cannot change how things are doen in DC seem to forget we had a surplus, a booming economy, PEACE and a middle class.
Eight short years of the shrub, and it is all changed..Who says one person cannot make a difference.
It is also VERY interesting that Mc\Cain, Billary and the media, in general, all focus on "who can win" and NOT who will do the most to help the country. That is what Sen. Obama focuses on and THAT is why the people of the United states will elect him the next president.
One final thing; is it just me, or does Hillary refuse to call "her opponent" anything other that "her opponant"? She always refers to the republican as "Sen. McCain..my good friend, the patriot, the guy who can work accross the asile".
She sounds like she is affraid of offending McCain.
BUT it's OK to not give any respect to Senator Barack Obama, the person wwho ALWAYS
What will be different? Two long time insiders??
Those who time and again say one person cannot change how things are doen in DC seem to forget we had a surplus, a booming economy, PEACE and a middle class.
Eight short years of the shrub, and it is all changed..Who says one person cannot make a difference.
It is also VERY interesting that Mc\Cain, Billary and the media, in general, all focus on "who can win" and NOT who will do the most to help the country. That is what Sen. Obama focuses on and THAT is why the people of the United states will elect him the next president.
One final thing; is it just me, or does Hillary refuse to call "her opponent" anything other that "her opponant"? She always refers to the republican as "Sen. McCain..my good friend, the patriot, the guy who can work accross the asile".
She sounds like she is affraid of offending McCain.
BUT it's OK to not give any respect to Senator Barack Obama, the person wwho ALWAYS
Sen. Obama ALWAYS refers to his opponant as SENATOR Clinton or Hillary..she does not afford him the same respect.
watch and listen,..it's not too late.
The petty BS of politics is nothing compared to the fact that He has very little idea what he's talking about when it comes to issues. Most often his naivete and solutions miss the point and don't actually address the problems. It appears to me that he doesn,t really understand the issues.
He sure gets all sensitive when a little smut is thrown his way. At least Hilary throws her own comments and doesn't just have her peeps do it for her. He acts all saintly, like I don't do negative. Like he's seperate from his campaign folks.
People really should be worried about his inexperience and not cringe or call foul when ever some one brings it up.
@Anonymous: Thanks for the link. Excellent video, it points out exactly the kind of media bias that goes on all the time.
Unfortunately, I can't support Ron Paul. I think he's really good on some issues and really bad on others.
For one thing, his isolationist policy speaks of US imperialism. He's against membership in international organizations which interfere with US sovereignty and US needs (thus putting them above global needs). He wants us out of the United Nations, which does more good in a bad year than the US government has done in over 200.
He's also no great friend to women, minorities, and other oppressed peoples. On racism, for instance, he appears to suffer from "colorblindness" which only ends up supporting racism. (Since we live in a racist society, and are quite often racist ourselves, we need to recognize race so that we don't miss unintentional racism.)
But more than any of that, Ron Paul, though a radical by US political standards, is only about an inch from the midline if one takes a broader view. The real radicals never make it in politics or get into the media, unless they get real results outside of politics, like Gandhi and King--and we all know what happened to them.
I reiterate: politics (in their current form) are not the answer. You elect the politician who'll do the least damage and the most amount of good, and then you go back to making real changes outside of politics.
Some of the remarks are excellent and go right to the heart of what is happening in our corporately owned nation. But some are just rants and raves, trying to protect whatever false perception they may have carved out of the inaccuracies the medias have produced for them.
Since our own mainstream media is also a corporately owned industry they tend to feed us whatever they want us to believe to maintain power. So many comments reflect these ill-gotten beliefs.
It's been outrageous what the radical reactionary wing of the Republican Party has achieved. They have without much ado, brainwashed millions of people who willingly placed an "R" on their forehead and chanted the corporate mantra which totally went against their own self-interest. Ya really gotta give em credit... The conglomerate "Republicans" are the champions.
I am hoping beyond hope that Barack Obama's words of wisdom will resonate throughout this group and perhaps sprinkle a few seeds of truth which will take root upon the minds of these pathetic souls of mimicry. But I'm not going to hold my breath. It's just been too long and it's just too hard to lay down the tarnished sword of mendacity. The shame might be too overwhelming.
I disagree. I think Obama should at the very least have his name first on the ticket. I don't think Hilly would make for a bad commander-in-chief, but after the way she has chosen to run her campaign I just can't respect her. Also, (largely because Dick Cheney has expanded the role) the vice presidency is a mostly powerless position. If Barack Obama doesn't take the office I'd prefer he at least stay in the Senate and not be left in some far and forgotten wing of the White House to collect dust.
They're rich; they don't care about "the news" anymore. No one there has done any real journalism in a decade. Murrow is rolling in his grave. You ought to be ashamed of yourselves.
Hussain (Obama) 1, Bush 3, or Clinton 2.
Those are your choices, America. All terrible. I want to take a mulligan on this election. Jeremiah Wright is like an uncle to Obama.....Obama said this himself....Wright was the pastor that married Barack and Michelle obama.
he hates the white man in my opinion. Read michelle obama's thesis.... she hates whites too. and thats fine, just dont front that you want change....change we can believe in....empty Rhetoric.
And if you do not think that Hillary is a Republican you have had your eyes shut for too long.
Here is a duscussion of the Fairness Doctrine and its demise: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairness_doctrine
We also should repeal the Telecommunications Act of 1996 which enabled the consolidation of our media. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecommunications_Act_of_1996
Years ago he was against Bush's tax cuts for the super rich, now he's for them.
Now he proposes even more tax cuts for the oil, gas, insurance companies cause billions in profits aren't enough...got to make trillions!
Now he wants to tax your health insurance if you have it....
Wake up working America, Republicans are not about you!!
At least Obama cares about middle class working people. Stop listening to the critics and listen to the man.
Black & White
Rich & Poor
Christian & Muslim
Democrat & Republican
War & Peace
We will only be successful if we can bridge those gaps and be "One nation under god, indvisible, with liberty and justice for all."
@Mike: Ooh, his middle name's Hussein, he must be evil! What a cheap shot.
Look, black people are not separatist or anti-white just because they stand up and tell the truth about centuries of white exploitation. Our present racist/white-guilt society wants to deny that things were ever that bad for blacks, just like it wants to deny Native American/American Indian/First Nation genocide. Just like it wants to deny the continuing racism in this country, which goes beyond whether or not someone would vote for Obama, into such areas as an overwhelmingly disproportionate number of people of color living in poverty or in prison. As one book puts it, while whites have recessions, the rate of unemployed people of color in this country put them into a permanent depression.
And everybody, try to understand: electing the "right" candidate for President will not save this country. Not Ron Paul, not Obama, not Hillary, not McCain, not Kucinich or Gravel. Not Nader or Gore, either.
In order to become ANY kind of contender for Presidential election, a candidate has to espouse a program of business-more-or-less-as usual. Granted, some like Ron Paul have more radical ideas than others, but even he supports the underlying system of corporate-government domination.
People like Ron Paul and Obama think you can reform the system from within, but that means they don't question the system itself, merely the direction it's presently going. Systemic reform is a worthy goal, but at some point, we're going to have to replace the system with something actually democratic, instead of the minimalist democracy we have now. And that's a change no serious Presidential candidate (Democrat or Republican) would ever dream of.
Fuck Your agenda!!!
911 INSIDE JOB!
That's the real story they won't back Why don't they smear Jesse Ventura? GD cowards... NAZI's Hitler Ugen!
http://mrxfromplanetx.com/orwell-rolls-in-his-g...
Colin Powell's son Michael Powell deregulated the media allowing these big corporations buy everything up and have a monopoly on the market. Most likely GE figures Obama might actually try to do some good in the world, so they have turned on him.
The biggest threat we face right now is the elderly voter. They vote more than anyone else, and the corporate controlled media like ABC and Fox is where they get their news from.
We all need to make our parents (I'm almost 40) and our grandparents watch these videos so they know what the hell they are doing.
Young people need to get involved in their local caucuses because the caucuses determine the state delegates. The delegates determine who their party runs for Congress and the Senate. alternativeconservative.com
If we got enough good people into power again (Democrat or Republican), we might be able to get control over the media again. We need to return control of the media to local markets.
A study was done showing how damaging corporate ownership is to local markets and the FCC buried it.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?st...
It's an honest mistake, you got your corporate overlords a little mixed up: NBC is owned by General Electric, ABC is owned by Disney, now we can start the discussions on whether the light-bulb is more evil than mickey mouse, plenty of good arguments on each side.
The topic does get complicated, GE is 1 hell of a war profiteer but then turns around & presents the closest things to "liberal" we're allowed to see in the MSM on MSNBC shows like Countdown or Dan Abrams' new fight with Karl Rove over Sigelman (that seems like it's getting personal) or the recent hire of Rachel Maddow. I'm saying it's their ability to play both sides, they've been in this Military-Industrial game from day 1 & that's why they have been turning slightly pro-Obama lately. Hedging their bets will keep the cash flowing no matter what the citizenry does. Murdoch's big gamble was good for a quick massive explosion of popularity but FOX was always going to be completely marginalized eventually barring an actual declaration of martial law & suspension of the constitution.
I'm so ready for this to heat up :)
G
Seek out your own truths and don't believe everything you hear.
And don't forget all the singing,dancing,reality shows that have mushroomed since 2001. Keeps people kind of distracted, eh? And where the heck does all that prize money come? You have to smarter than a 5th grader to figure that out?
HIT PROJECT VOTESMART ON THE INTERNET, AND READ THE CANDIDATES' RESPONSES TO THE QUESTIONNAIRE. Read on the candidates' personal and voting records.
Then, VOTE FOR THE THIRD PARTY CANDIDATE OF YOUR CHOICE, NOT THE DEMOCRAT OR THE REPUBLICAN OF THE MEDIA'S CHOICE. The big oil companies, the media, the pharmaceutical companies, and the other major corporations in the USA, are all D-E-E-P in the pockets of the Democrats and the Republicans. The only solution is to vote OUT the D's and the R's and vote IN members of third parties, who have no vested interests in big corporations and who have received no money from corporate investors or lobbyists.
Either vote them out, or shoot them out. Make your choice now, while we still have ballots, or else it will come to bullets when hungry, sick, angry poor people start exercising our second Amendment rights to start a SECOND AMERICAN REVOLUTION.
"Faux News is nothing but a bunch of "RACIST HACKS"! LOUD MOUTH RACIST!! I CAN'T BELIEVE BLACK PEOPLE WORK FOR THAT CRAP NETWORK"!!
Obama had better stop whinning about the "Hillary Attacks" because, if he's the nominee, he'll have to answer those questions from McCain.
I don't really care who wins the nomination--I'll vote Democrat.
Loyal Dem
if they're are suppose to be "Fair and balanced" then they are not suppose to have a "view", they only are to have factual news, isn't that correct?? Or did I miss that part in my journalism classes? Because I thought REAL journalist were suppose to give fact based NEWS not fantasy based b.s.
And by fair and balanced I mean a consummate and detestable mockery of moral and ethical news reporting.
You should be petitioning for them to change thier product description because they are not too unlike Media Matter, they just sit oin the other side of the spectrum.
Richard C. August commented 27 days ago:
Here's an idea, folks.
HIT PROJECT VOTESMART ON THE INTERNET, AND READ THE CANDIDATES' RESPONSES TO THE QUESTIONNAIRE. Read on the candidates' personal and voting records.
Then, VOTE FOR THE THIRD PARTY CANDIDATE OF YOUR CHOICE, NOT THE DEMOCRAT OR THE REPUBLICAN OF THE MEDIA'S CHOICE. The big oil companies, the media, the pharmaceutical companies, and the other major corporations in the USA, are all D-E-E-P in the pockets of the Democrats and the Republicans. The only solution is to vote OUT the D's and the R's and vote IN members of third parties, who have no vested interests in big corporations and who have received no money from corporate investors or lobbyists.
Either vote them out, or shoot them out. Make your choice now, while we still have ballots, or else it will come to bullets when hungry, sick, angry poor people start exercising our second Amendment rights to start a SECOND AMERICAN REVOLUTION.
Commitment to the Black Community
Commitment to the Black Family.
Adherence to the Black Work Ethic.
Pledge to Make the Fruits of All Developing and Acquired Skills Available to the Black Community.
Pledge to Allocate Regularly, a Portion of Personal Resources for Strengthening and Supporting Black Institutions.
Pledge Allegiance to All Black Leadership Who Espouse and Embrace the Black Value System.
Personal Commitment to Embracement of the Black Value System.
####### Somehow this isn't okay #########
Commitment to the WHITE Community
Commitment to the WHITE Family.
Adherence to the WHITE Work Ethic.
Pledge to Make the Fruits of All Developing and Acquired Skills Available to the WHITE Community.
Pledge to Allocate Regularly, a Portion of Personal Resources for Strengthening and Supporting WHITE Institutions.
Pledge Allegiance to All WHITE Leadership Who Espouse and Embrace the WHITE Value System.
Personal Commitment to Embracement of the WHITE Value System.
Do you see where I'm going with this? The problem isn't that there is a liberal bias, or a conservative bias, the problem is that there is any freakin' bias at all! Tell me what these words and phrases have in common: newspaper, nightly news, cable news channel, news agency. If you guessed they all contain the word "news," then you would be correct. And what is the definition of news? From MW: a report of recent events.
A report of recent events. Hmmm, sounds kind of cut and dry to me. You report the events that happened. So what would you call it when a bunch of people sit around discussing things that happened, offering their opinions and/or speculating on future events? I can tell you what it's not called, NEWS. That's right, it's not news. So if you want to have those kinds of programs, they don't belong on a NEWS CHANNEL, now do they? Furthermore, things that are said on those kinds of programs should not be reported as news because they are simply people's opinions. If you want to report on what Hannity said on his show, the headline should read: "Hannity says Obama is baby killer", not "Obama: Baby Killer?"
That's the problem with news in this country. It's not that it's biased, it's that it's NOT NEWS. It's poorly researched sensationalist crap. So let's all stop arguing about the freakin' bias in the media and start demanding that they actually report the news, without any bias at all.
Reading just a few posts, OBAMA supporters are just upset at an outlet that TELLS THE TRUTH.
In my WILDEST DREAMS I can not fathom why everyone doesn't see a phoney tin horn ambitious liar every time Obama opens his mouth. He's as transparant as glass to me. He CAN NOT speak on the issues without a telepromter and THAT is WHY he won't do Town Halls with McCain.
A FEW of Obama's FAULTS:
1) No experience. As a JUNIOR Senator, he has 3 years in the US Senate and 7 years in the Illinois Senate. He's missed 43% of Senate Votes this year.
2) The GREAT UNITER has NEVER ONCE CROSSED PARTY LINES to create legislation. He has voted WITH his party 96.5% of the time. WHERE is his "reaching across the asile"?? I'll tell you .. WORDS.... JUST WORDS (from his plagerized speech).
3) You'll love it when he raises your payroll taxes for Social Security AND increases Capital Gains tax from 15 to 28%. You probably won't be thrilled when he increases corporate taxes and your employer responds by either cutting YOUR salary OR cutting your job.
4) HE HAS NO PLAN FOR NATIONAL SECURITY. Read HIS WEB SITE... under ISSUES. It's NOT THERE! Homeland Security is there... it's NOT THE SAME THING. During Primaries he said he will CUT MILITARY and DEFENSE SPENDING, PARTICULARILY IN THE AREA OF WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT and use that money to fund his SCARY NATIONAL HEALTH CARE plan!
This guy is SOOO JIMMY CARTER that it makes my hair stand on end. The great bumbling Carter who didn't have a clue that National Security IS SUPPOSE TO BE THE MAIN JOB OF THE GOVERNMENT... he had NO CLUE what to do with the Iran Hostage Crisis... he was just, to be very kind here... USELESS!!!!
If you think things are bad today then you weren't trying to buy a house under Carter when the Interest rate on mortgages was 18%!!!!
5)Obama's ENERGY plan will be great....... in 2030 and 2050!! HE HAS NO PLAN TO HELP AMERICANS TODAY. CAN YOU WAIT 22 years for a solution to this problem????? NOT! The energy crisis and the economy are hand in hand. If you think it's bad now....... elect Obama. You'll find out what BAD is!!
6) JUDGEMENT: He has a lot of judgement.. and it's all bad. In OBAMA's OWN WORDS, from his book, THE AUDACITY OF HOPE...not Wright's words... OBAMA's WORDS..... "I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction," . Lovely.
I'm not sure he knows anyone who isn't a terrorist (William Ayers the 70's bomber)... or a Racist (Louis Farrakhan and REV WRight...and HIS WIFE).... or a guy (Rezko) convicted of fraud, bribery, money laundering and real estate scams. I guess his mother never told him that he'd be judged by who his friends were. How many times can he convincingly say "I never saw that.. That's not the (fill in the blank) that I knew". B S! He profited PERSONALLY (by buying property at well under market value from Rezko) and PROFESSIONALLY... Rezko was a money raiser for Obama. GREAT RECOMMENDATION FOR THE HIGHEST OFFICE IN THE LAND!!!!
Oh, he can spin and win it, but the thought of what will happen to this country is beyond depressing. One world. One nation under Obama. The Anti Christ.
All spin, NO SUBSTANCE..... CHANGE... yep.... that's ALL you'll have if he's elected. A few cents worth of CHANGE. Your parents won't have their retirement funds... you probably won't have a job, and you certainly won't have a car or a house so I guess you won't have to worry about fuel for what you don't have!
By the way.... I don't have a horse in this race. The way I see it, there are only Democrats running. McCain, a sane Democrat and then Obama, who is really a Socialist and not a Democrat.
I HAVE CHECKED OUT THE FULL TAPES.
BUT -STILL -WRIGHT IS UNQUESTIONABLY
A RABBLE ROUSER WHO SPEAKS TO THE NARCISSISM
OF SELF-BASTING VICTIMHOOD.
---UT---UH
Obamba has his press secretaries known as ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN and MSNBC. If we didn't have Fox
the trught would never be told.
-See guys -uh- this decades stale 70's Show
is about as meaningful as a Coke vs. Pepsi
taste test.
Meanwhile the awesomely genocidal Red Chinese
have quietly bought-off your entire media.
---we'll see---
MAN RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEATHS OF 70,000,000
OF HIS COUNTRYMEN ---IN PEACETIME?
-I'M SPEAKING OF MAO TSE TUNG OF COURSE.
---NEVER MENTIONED -NEVER A PROBLEM.
---AND NOT A SINGLE HOLLYWOOD MOVIE
TREATING THE SUBJECT.
--DID SOMEONE SAY '-BAULKING SYCOPHANTS?'